During a reply to someone who commented about THE DARK AT THE END, I realized that if Jack had not been worried about collateral damage in that novel, he could have made NIGHTWORLD unnecessary.

I stayed at a hotel in the Loop and decided I like the town. Good pizzas and hot dogs. Got NO writing done. Time to buckle down and get back in the groove.

[URL="http://www.learntobrew.com/store/item/2y7nb/-_Decorative_Signs/Free_Beer_Tomorrow_Framed.html"]


http://www.learntobrew.com/store/item/2y...ramed.html[/URL]


I thought this appropriate.

I wonder if this person is a member here. They have the first reply below the review. How I ended up there is long and convoluted.

http://www.avclub.com/articles/the-unborn,22181/

Today an article appeared suggesting what Ryan Reynolds might do to repair his screen image. As I pointed out in the Who's your cast" thread, his films are not performing well this summer and that this could severely damper studio executives selecting him for future work. It was also remarked he is having a tough time faring with critics and audiences alike.

Of the films he is contractually bound to do (Deadpool among them), there was no mention of Repairman Jack. Perhaps the author might be unaware of Jack or Reynolds' "attachment".


At any rate, as someone who works within the entertainment industry, Reynolds needs to find something that will
allow him to be cast against type.

Hello All,

According to publishing dates the order to read this series would be The Keep, The Tomb, The Touch, Reborn, Reprisal and Nightworld however, according to the Repairman Jack website itself the order would be The Keep, Reborn, The Tomb, The Touch, Reprisal and Nightworld, which one is correct?

I am just getting into reading these books and this is probably a stupid question for all you long time fans but seeing the different orders from various sources is a little confusing. I can't wait to get started on the next book I just want to make sure it's the correct one. Thank you in advance for your help.

:confused:mmyett

Finishing a chapter and realizing you’ve written it from the wrong POV. Sure, changing it around makes it better, but all that extra work does not advance the narrative a whit. Bummer.

the final correction on the tpb just went in. Won’t be long now.

This movie is a giant steaming pile of crap. It seemed as if someone tried to make the worst possible movie they could and this is what came of it.

I won't even begin to list the problems with this piece of poo but, wow. Just wow.

[h=2]Wilfred and Archer[/h][INDENT]Nature abhors a vacuum and I'm a natural sort of guy so I couldn't leave my viewing vacuum empty for long. I have just wrapped up two outstanding series, Breaking Bad(Season 3) and Damages(Season 1), so I was on the prowl for something new and happened across Wilfred and Archer. I believe someone had mentioned Wilfred here but my search turned up nothing. Anyway both are part of FX's Fully Baked line of programming intended for mature audiences but I'm watching anyway.

Wilfred stars Elijah Wood as a stoner who is the only person who sees and converses with his neighbor's dog(everyone else sees him as a dog) Wilfred. I'm a little mixed on this one, on the one hand there are some hilarious moments but on the other hand it can be disturbingly dark. I have only watched 3 episodes so far so my jury is still out.

Archer is an incredibly raunchy animated series about some incredibly lusty super spies(think James Bond with an NC-17 rating). If you think that sounds funny then you'll love it-I'm in the love camp myself. [/INDENT]