Legion Wrote:From everything I have seen on the exteriors, however, they are the exact same width.
That's not uncommon. The Colt's model 1911 -- which was originally designed and chambered for the 45ACP cartridge -- is also chambered in 38 Super, 40 S&W, 9X21, 9X23, 10mm, and even 9mm. And probably other cartridges as well. All the differences are internal.
Quote:My main question on this issue has always been the spring strength, While I am sure a 40 would be strong enough for a 9mm, it may not be for the opposite. Also the spring itself may be too strong in the 9mm so that it would not let the slide go back and forth enough resulting in jams. This is actually a good topic for the glock forums ( of which I am not a member).
The recoil spring for the 9mm would be too weak for the 40S&W cartridge, and the spring for the 40 would be too heavy for the 9mm cartridge.
Quote:From my experience I cannot imagine the trigger pull being any lighter than the Glock 27, which almost has a hair trigger ( something I am not fond of ) despite the internal safety.
What internal safety? The Glocks I've seen had only a trigger block -- which is in the actual trigger itself -- as a safety. In my mind, that's not much of a safety, and that's why the NYPD had extra heavy triggers installed on the Glocks used by their officers -- after a number of officers had shot themselves because they placed their fingers on the trigger when drawing their guns.
Quote:Speaking of which, you have gotten me thinking. While it operates as an auto, what the hell would the Glock be considered.
It's an auto loader, just like any other auto loader.
Quote: The internal safety and complete lack of any exterior hammer would prevent it from being classified as a true double action, or at least in my eyes.
Has anybody ever said that the Glock is a double action? If so, I've never heard of it. The Glock doesn't even have a hammer -- internal or otherwise. What it does have is a "striker," much like the striker on a bolt action rifle.
Quote:I guess I should rephrase my question. Is the Kahr an automatic or a repeater. I am guessing from what you have said it is an auto.
You could call it an automatic repeater, but auto loader is what I call it/them -- automatic for short. Basically, they all function the same way. You fire a round and the recoil impulse causes the slide to move backward, which extracts the spent case from the barrel and ejects it from the gun, when the slide moves forward again, (by means of the recoil spring) it strips a round from the magazine and pushes it into the chamber. Then you have to release the trigger so that the internals can reset (there's a "disconnector" inside the gun which "disconnects" the trigger from the hammer or -- in the case of the Glock -- the striker) and you're ready to press the trigger again. So. It fires, ejects, and "automatically" loads another round into the chamber.
It's like calling your vehicle an automobile or a car. Both terms come from from the original "Automobile Carriage."
Quote:Wait, just found out for sure. To convert a Glock 26 to the specs of a Glock 27 you will need a complete Glock 27 slide assembly, a 40S&W trigger housing, and G27 magazine ( which is obvious, or so I would think). So apparently it is doable, just a little more complicated than I had been told, but not by much. Still wouldn't want to do it on the go, so to speak.
In short, you need everything but the frame, and even then, you need the "trigger housing" . . . whatever that is.
Quote:Of course you can always get a conversion kit and go down to a 22LR. Good for a day of practicing at the range I guess. Don't see the point as it is going to be nowhere near the same experience as firing a 9 or a 40.
There are .22 conversion kits for the Colt's 45 ACP as well. Not a big deal . . . unless you consider how much they cost.
The "advantage to these .22 conversion kits is simply . . . cheap ammunition.
Ken V.