Ken Valentine Wrote:It has a striker system very much like the Glock. I would classify the Glock as being sorta single action in that it has a very short trigger pull. The Kahr has a long trigger pull very much like a double action revolver, only much lighter.
Have you actually tried it? The model 26 is a 9mm, and the 27 is chambered in 40 S&W. The barrels may be interchangeable in the sense that one might possibly fit into the slide of the other, but unless Glock has some kind of magic slide, with a quick-change breech-face and extractor, they won't function. The 40 S&W won't fit into the breech-face machined for a 9mm, (which means that the slide won't close) and the 9mm has too small a case head to function in a slide machined for a 40 S&W -- the extractor won't reliably (if at all) reach the extractor groove to pull the case out of the barrel.
Then there's the extractor-relief-cut in the barrel which will probably not be the same for the different calibers.
And the magazines won't function properly. I don't believe that a "40" mag will actually fit in the 9mm gun -- the 40 mags are wider. And if you try to put a 9mm mag in a 40, they'll, at best, rattle around in the frame -- if they don't actually fall out of the gun. I'll have to dig out some Glock mags and check them, but I don't believe you can load a 9mm mag with 40's, and the the 40 mag may have lips that are to wide to function in a 9mm slide.
I'm sure he does, he was very specific, having mentioned "pocket carry" in both the title of the thread . . . and his post.
Ken V.
Not myself. Tina's father ( a gun enthusiast is putting it lightly) read it awhile back and has been ranting about it ever since. I asked the guys at my shop and they said they've heard tell of it, but not they themselves.
From everything I have seen on the exteriors, however, they are the exact same width. My main question on this issue has always been the spring strength, While I am sure a 40 would be strong enough for a 9mm, it may not be for the opposite. Also the spring itself may be too strong in the 9mm so that it would not let the slide go back and forth enough resulting in jams. This is actually a good topic for the glock forums ( of which I am not a member).
From my experience I cannot imagine the trigger pull being any lighter than the Glock 27, which almost has a hair trigger ( something I am not fond of ) despite the internal safety.
Speaking of which, you have gotten me thinking. While it operates as an auto, what the hell would the Glock be considered. The internal safety and complete lack of any exterior hammer would prevent it from being classified as a true double action, or at least in my eyes.
I guess I should rephrase my question. Is the Kahr an automatic or a repeater. I am guessing from what you have said it is an auto.
Wait, just found out for sure. To convert a Glock 26 to the specs of a Glock 27 you will need a complete Glock 27 slide assembly, a 40S&W trigger housing, and G27 magazine ( which is obvious, or so I would think). So apparently it is doable, just a little more complicated than I had been told, but not by much. Still wouldn't want to do it on the go, so to speak.
Of course you can always get a conversion kit and go down to a 22LR. Good for a day of practicing at the range I guess. Don't see the point as it is going to be nowhere near the same experience as firing a 9 or a 40.