fpw Wrote:[SIZE="3"]PM me so I can check out a theoretical injury to a Glock.[/SIZE]
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:I'm sure that's just for curiosity's sake, Paul. Certainly nobody in one of your wholesome tales would even =think= about carrying something as evil as a...what did you call it?...a Glook? Mercy! Leave =that= kind of action to Nora Roberts!
Biggles Wrote:Hey! What you callin' evil, dude?
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:A Glook, you betcha! Something I've read about in Nora Roberts' matchless stories. Do they really exist? Yo, Judge, did you see my question about "fighting words?" What's yer verdict, Yer Honner?
Biggles Wrote:Can't say I know Jack about Glooks, but I've got two Glocks that I'm very close to, so mind your tongue when you talk about 'em.
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:I'm sure you keep your pair =really= close...:p But straight biz, Biggles: "fighting words." Clue me in as to what the law has to say. Could an insult be so harsh as to be construed as "assault?"
Biggles Wrote:Law varies from state to state. If you want a law professor's opinion (based upon common law) pm me with specifics. You should know that I can't advise you on NY law.
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:Nothing so serious, Biggles. I was just wondering if the law's evolved. I expect a frontier judge would look at the concept differently than say, a San Francisco judge today.
The first: "It's too bad you lost your eye, son, but you should have known better than to talk like that to Ken V."
The second: "There's an old saying, Mr. Valentine, 'sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me.' A jury of your peers has found you guilty of assault. I sentence you to reading Bluesman Mike's posts for the next eight months." "N-O-O-O-!" Ken's lawyer: "We will appeal this, Your Honor! Surely your sentence is cruel and unusual punishment!"