fpw Wrote:"Instead the villagers had conferred together and decided..."
Unless they conferred with someone else, the together is vestigial, superfluous, and not necessary neither. It must DIE!
I don't believe that's bad at all. Let's imagine a Beckett stage direction:
(The VILLAGERS conferred...alone)
1st VILLAGER: Have you conferred today?
2nd VILLAGER: Yes. Have you?
1st VILLAGER: Yes.
2nd VILLAGER: And where where you?
1st VILLAGER: Alone. Somewhere.
2nd VILLAGER: I didn't see you there.
1st VILLAGER: I didn't see you either.
2nd VILLAGER: It was a good conference, though.
1st VILLAGER: Yes.
2nd VILLAGER: I enjoyed it.
1st VILLAGER: Yes. But perhaps no.
2nd VILLAGER: Some might say that.
1st VILLAGER: Yes. But they were not there. Were you? I didn't see you there.
2nd VILLAGER: Where have I left my pitchfork?
1st VILLAGER: Perhaps where I left my torch.
2nd VILLAGER: Perhaps at the conference. Do you have a cigarette?
1st VILLAGER: No. I left them at the conference.
2nd VILLAGER: As did I. It was a good conference. Where you there?
TOGETHER: "Fair is foul and foul is fair..."
!st VILLAGER: I don't believe he wrote that.
2nd VILLAGER: Nor do I. But perhaps...
1st VILLAGER: He would have had a cigarette.
2nd VILLAGER: I did not see him at the conference.
1st VILLAGER: Nor did I. It was an excellent conference.
2nd VILLAGER: Were you there?
(Rapturous applause from the intelligensia, and a Nobel Prize for genius.)