Just read in FPW's newsletter that he has decided on "Harbingers" as the title for the 10th RJ novel. I think he might have said that here, too. But it's now officially official and Lisa was credited with the brainstorm! Lisa's gonna get mentioned in the acknowledgement section of the book, too.
Way cool, Lisa, you brilliant Ms. Thing!![[Image: woohoo.gif]](http://www.smileyville.com/images/happy/woohoo.gif)
Way cool, Lisa, you brilliant Ms. Thing!
Reading is freedom.
The mind soars, no earthly cares,
no limitations.
A Maggers Haiku, 2005
Years ago my mother used to say to me... "In this world, Elwood, you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant."
Well, for years I was smart.
I recommend pleasant.
You may quote me.
Elwood P. Dowd
Congrats, Lisa 
! I hadn't heard. I didn't get the newsletter either. :confused:
! I hadn't heard. I didn't get the newsletter either. :confused:
So should I place my order now, or wait until it's been assigned an ISBN?
You really only need three things: WD-40, Duct Tape, and a pointy stick. If it's supposed to move and doesn't, use the WD-40. If it moves and isn't supposed to, use the Duct Tape. If you want it to move and it doesn't want to, use the pointy stick. The rest of life is easy.
Maggers Wrote:Just read in FPW's newsletter that he has decided on "Harbingers" as the title for the 10th RJ novel. I think he might have said that here, too. But it's now officially official and Lisa was credited with the brainstorm! Lisa's gonna get mentioned in the acknowledgement section of the book, too.
Way cool, Lisa, you brilliant Ms. Thing!
I read that! "Wicked Cool", eh Lisa?
http://www.northernindianacriminaldefense.com
"I don't always carry a pistol, but when I do, I prefer an East German Makarov"
Congrats, Lisa!
"Harbingers" is pretty good title. Oh, I can't wait the new RJ book!
"Harbingers" is pretty good title. Oh, I can't wait the new RJ book!
Harbingers, why not just call the thing obfuscation? Is this some sort of sign that future titles will leave us befuddled?
Scott
Jesus died for your sins, get your money's worth. Chad Daniels
Scott Miller Wrote:Harbingers, why not just call the thing obfuscation?Shouldn't that be obfuscations, keeping with the tradition of plural nouns?
(Hmmm. This kind of reminds me of one of my favorite aphorisms: obscurity is not profundity, but passes for it 99% of the time.)
*SLMW 1.0* No animals were harmed in the production of this message.
Here's another, recent use of the word in a (LINK ->) CNN medical story on children as harbingers of the flu season. Very appropriate, I think.
