DominusDeus Wrote:Joshua Jackson is 31 and he certainly looks younger. I'm fairly certain that if he were chosen for the roll of Jack, he'd look just fine when the Nightworld move rolled around.
Also, a dab of movie makeup goes a damn long way when it comes to making someone look younger or older in movies. So I stand my my choice of Joshua Jackson.
My apology, Dom. I remembered my fellow Canuck's, Joshua's, age wrong.
So, given that hurdle is cleared, let's look at the rest, shall we?
1. Good...what's his build like?
2. Not so good.
3. Maybe too well known between Dawson's Creek and Fringe...undecided.
4. Haven't seen his "angry" except for
Cursed (2005) but that particular performance wasn't terribly impressive.
5. Check.
Now, lets compare that to someone like Sam Worthington:
1. Check...and has the body for the part.
2. Check.
3. (Prior to Avatar) check.
4. Maaaaaybe...the jury's still out. Can do grim though.
5. A little on the old side, at 34.
Or to Ryan Reynolds:
1. Check, but a little on the pretty side...and has the body for the part.
2. Sort-of.
3. Not really.
4. Yes, although some have knocked his ability to do "angry"
5. A little on the old-side at 34.
If they film the movie this year, there are better candidates than Joshua...in 2011 the current favourites will be too old and his stock goes up.
-Wapitikev