ccosborne3 Wrote:A remake should remain faithful to the original source material but add enough wrinkles to make the viewing experience new and fresh. Shot for shot remakes like Psycho or The Omen added nothing new and couldn't ever hope to match up with the originals.
. . . but add just a few more
wrinkles and you'd have a whole new film!
One you didnt already know the ending of
Shot-for-shot remakes are pointless, and make people moan.
"It's EXACTLY the same as the original!"
Radical changes to storylines/characters make people moan.
"It's nothing like the original, they just stole the name to make people watch it!"
I wonder why these remakes remain so popular, at the same time as being so unpopular --- if you look them up online, it seems that everyone is moaning about all the horror remakes around and despairing at the state of the Hollywood film industry. But presumably these films do good business, otherwise the studios wouldnt continue making them . . . :confused: