Pages (27):    1 2 3 4 5 27   
t4terrific   12-20-2005, 02:30 PM
#21
Marc B. Wrote:But does it swing both ways? Do you find woman on woman action repulsive or is that okay?

The physical act of lesbian sex isn't repulsive to me. The anatomy is different, and therefore the act is much different. I'm not really interested in a film about lesbian cowgirls either. I don't even watch the pornos.
t4terrific   12-20-2005, 02:31 PM
#22
Lisa Wrote::eek: Double B.S.! Now you're just scaring me.

Lisa

I'm saving triple for the big issues.
Maggers   12-20-2005, 02:32 PM
#23
t4terrific Wrote:... Now Maggers has deemed homosexuality as material that is not to be touched...

Huh? Slow down, t4, you're putting words in my mouth. Read what I wrote and provide me the quote where I said "homosexuality as material that is not to be touched."

What I said is that all opinions are welcome on this board and all should be respected. Your opinion is no more valid than mine.

Quote: You can say anything you want about the film as long as you don't mention gay as a negative. B.S.! Double even.

To repeat, you can think what you like about anything, including homosexuality. Just as I can think what I like about anything, inlcuding homosexuality.

Nothing I've written about your being entitled to your opinions negates the concept that your "pudding" joke was crass, no matter what you believe or don't believe.

Reading is freedom.
The mind soars, no earthly cares,
no limitations.
A Maggers Haiku, 2005


Years ago my mother used to say to me... "In this world, Elwood, you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant."
Well, for years I was smart.
I recommend pleasant.
You may quote me.

Elwood P. Dowd

t4terrific   12-20-2005, 02:39 PM
#24
Maggers Wrote:Nothing I've written about your being entitled to your opinions negates the concept that your "pudding" joke was crass, no matter what you believe or don't believe.

I can't take credit for that one. I was quoting another. When I saw the premise of this film, I couldn't believe it. Southpark's jokes, from years ago, were actually coming true.
t4terrific   12-20-2005, 02:41 PM
#25
Maggers Wrote:Huh? Slow down, t4, you're putting words in my mouth. Read what I wrote and provide me the quote where I said "homosexuality as material that is not to be touched."

What I said is that all opinions are welcome on this board and all should be respected. Your opinion is no more valid than mine.


Okay. You're right. I'm sorry.
Susan   12-20-2005, 03:41 PM
#26
Maggers Wrote:No one is shoving anything down your throat. As a wise man said once, vote with your feet. You don't like the movie, don't go to see it.

You seem quite upset. I'm not judging you, just your comment, which I found to be off color. It sounds to my ear that you are the one who is making distinctions and castigating those who disagree with you.

As I've said many times on this board, we are all entitled to our beliefs. That means I'm as entitled to mine as you are to yours. That also means, to me at any rate, that I wouldn't mock, ridicule or otherwise make you wrong for thinking or feeling as you do.

Well said, Maggers.

Susan

FPW Stores:
A dreamer is one who can only find his way by moonlight, and his punishment is that he sees the dawn before the rest of the world. ~ Oscar Wilde

Insanity in individuals is something rare -- but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.~Nietzche
KRW   12-20-2005, 04:30 PM
#27
Maggers Wrote:That's kind of crass.

Dang I was shooting for uncouth, I guess that's close enough. Big Grin


Maggers Wrote:The film is about a whole lot more than just sex between men.

What do you do when you love someone and you know you will never have the life with that person that you so desire? Whether your a man or a woman, it's painful and the heartache may be something you never get over.


I have no problem with the plot, I was just pointing out the holes in it. Wink


KRW
Scott Hajek   12-20-2005, 04:31 PM
#28
t4terrific Wrote:The physical act of lesbian sex isn't repulsive to me. The anatomy is different, and therefore the act is much different. I'm not really interested in a film about lesbian cowgirls either. I don't even watch the pornos.

Besides, in reference to homosexuality, the Bible only forbids a man to lay with another man. Woman on woman action is acceptable, which only solidifies the idea that God is a man or that the Bible was written by men. (This is the only part of the Bible I like to quote, by the way, it's fun to watch reactions when you point this out.)

Regarding this movie, the subject matter may not be ideal for most, but it all boils down to a love story. So what if it's between two puddin' eatin' cowboys, two Bible-sanctioned women, a man and a woman, a woman and a man, a man and his car, a woman and an ape... it's just a love story. You don't like love stories? Don't go see it.

Scott Hajek

[i]"A beer right now would sound good, but I'd rather drink one than listen to it."[/i]
KRW   12-20-2005, 04:35 PM
#29
AsMoral Wrote:Damn homos, bad enough they're on TV... now in the movies as well! When will the madness end? I say we go burn vaginas on their front lawns! Heteros rule!



Shouldn't we warn them first to change their wicked ways by throwing throwing one through their window with a note tied to it? That'll shake em up! Let's start with Richard Simmons, he's just begging for reform! Big Grin


KRW
Tony H   12-20-2005, 04:38 PM
#30
KRW Wrote:Shouldn't we warn them first to change their wicked ways by throwing throwing one through their window with a note tied to it? That'll shake em up! Let's start with Richard Simmons, he's just begging for reform! Big Grin


KRW

If the note falls off they may deem it a sign of the apocolypse and all flee to fire island for a fabulous cookout. The world needs gays, who else will do all those makeover shows?

“I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum.”
Certified 100% Serious
Pages (27):    1 2 3 4 5 27   
  
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
Made with by Curves UI.