Ken Valentine Wrote:And then, only if her husband is RH positive. Generally speaking, (If I remember correctly) in her first pregnancy, the baby would get sick but in the second pregnancy -- after her body had built up antibodies -- the second baby (and possibly the mother as well) will not survive.
But transfusing someone who is RH negative with RH positive blood will make them sick.
Ken V.
Without transfusion, first Rh+ child Rh- mother Rh+ father, no problem. I offer myself (A+) as example.
Transfusion to a female of Rh+ blood or pregnancy with Rh+ child (this usually includes pregnancies ending in miscarriage or other abortion, but duration can be a factor) almost always results in production of maternal antibodies which will attack any later Rh+ fetus, though Rh- fetuses (feti?) are safe. Thus my first sister (O-) no problem, my second sister (A+) some problems, my third sister (O+) serious problems and amazing she survived even with lots of care (as in total blood replacement by transfusion immediately after birth). I never knew the details and my mother's memory is not what it once was (and it wasn't that reliable on her best day). But it caused me to make some study of genetics at a very early age, surprising grade school teachers by knowing the difference between genotype and phenotype (several of them had to look it up).
Transfusion or earlier Rh+ pregnancy(s) notwithstanding, Rh- children by an Rh- mother carry no more than normal risk (which is more risk than I was ever willing to cause, I had a vasectomy fairly young due to cowardice and consideration).