Lisa Wrote:Marry you and him.
Lisa
Maybe the GU-4 can coincide with the wedding ceremony.
Scott Hajek
[i]"A beer right now would sound good, but I'd rather drink one than listen to it."[/i]
Lisa Wrote:Marry you and him.
Lisa
Rimshot, please.
http://www.northernindianacriminaldefense.com
"I don't always carry a pistol, but when I do, I prefer an East German Makarov"
Biggles Wrote:At least President Bush isn't trying to disarm you and me. What do you think a Massachusetts liberal will do?
Probably not much different from what Bush has done -- and has promised to do.
The so-called PATRIOT Act is a downright treasonous assault on the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution.
The McCain-Feingold Incumbency Protection Act -- in the name of campaign reform -- is also an egregious assault on the First Ammendment.
Bush has promised to sign the renewal of the Assault Weapon-Magazine Limitation Ban, if/when it comes across his desk. A blatant violation of the Second amendment!
In thirty nine months as president, Bush has not vetoed a single bill! The last president to do that was James Garfield in 1881! And he at least had an excuse! He was shot four months after he was inaugurated, and died two months later.
Even that FDR New Deal Democrat Ronald Reagan vetoed about ten bills a year!
I wouldn't vote for Bush if you put a gun to my head. Mind you, I'd put a gun to my own head before I'd vote for Kerry -- or any other Democrap for that matter.
I would not be the slightest bit surprised -- if it looks like the election would go badly for Bush -- to see another "terrorist" attack on the U.S..
Ken V.
Lisa Wrote:Marry you and him.
Lisa
"Brevity is the soul of wit."
Missed the keyboard this time . . . YAY!
Ken - wiping the Pepsi off his monitor - V.
Ken Valentine Wrote:The so-called PATRIOT Act is a downright treasonous assault on the First, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Ninth, and Tenth Amendments to the Constitution.I agree 100%.
Ken Valentine Wrote:The McCain-Feingold Incumbency Protection Act -- in the name of campaign reform -- is also an egregious assault on the First Ammendment.Is that part of the campaign reform bill? At least that limits (potential) gov't candidates as opposed to actual citizens.
Ken Valentine Wrote:I would not be the slightest bit surprised -- if it looks like the election would go badly for Bush -- to see another "terrorist" attack on the U.S.Are you saying similar to what happened in Spain or orchestrated by the "powers that be"?
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. ... The piecing together of dissociated knowledge will open up such terrifying vistas of reality, and of our frightful position therein, that we shall either go mad from the revelation or flee from the light into the peace and safety of a new dark age.
~ Howard Phillips Lovecraft
jimbow8 Wrote:Is that part of the campaign reform bill? At least that limits (potential) gov't candidates as opposed to actual citizens.
Yes, it's part of the so-called campaign reform act. It limits contributions in such a way as to be disastrous to third parties, extremely difficult for challengers of incumbents, and forbids political criticism right before an election. (that's the first amendment part.)
Quote:Are you saying similar to what happened in Spain or orchestrated by the "powers that be"?
Either way. I wouldn't be surprised if they either MAKE it happen, or LET it happen.
Ken - my cynicism is showing - V.