Richard Kendrick Wrote:That wasn't the point of my post. It was to show that at one time he was registered as a Democrat and has since moved to another state which does not let you choose a party affiliation. It is clear what his party affiliation would be if he was in a state where you have the option.
I was more amused by the fact that Moore (according to the story) had not voted since 1991.
RIK
Marc B. Wrote:I'm actually a little annoyed by that comment. I know Bush is a liar, not because Moore tells me, but because I actually read the news and from many different sources. I don't believe anything from any one individual.
Scott Hajek Wrote:So, whether Moore registered in one party or not, he doesn't have to affiliate himself with either one. So, what does it matter? He's not running for office. But, he would get my vote if he did.
sublime1983 Wrote:I had never heard him say that. I wonder how many people actually do take what he says in that way? I doubt too many of them do. Do you remember where you heard that? I would love to read that.
sublime1983 Wrote:I don't know who you have been debating, and I'm a little late on this thread, but I don't know a single Conservative who responds like that.
sublime1983 Wrote:Wow, so you would vote for a man who has never said anything that has been true over a President who has the backbone to do what is needed to defend ourselves? I'm probably preaching to the wrong congregation, here. Maybe I should stop talking politics on this site.
Marc B. Wrote:For over a year after 9/11 Bush kept linking Saddam and Iraq to the terrorist hijackers. It got to the point that the vast majority of Americans BELIEVED the terrorists were from Iraq when, in truth, none of them were. Almost two years after the WTC came down Bush finally admitted that Saddam had no ties to Al Qaeda.
sublime1983 Wrote:The torture issue is a tough one. I think that it is part of war. The guy who was in the news a while back talking about how we had those laws so that our soldiers don't get hurt when they are captured is a little lacking in the head. Like the terrorist follow the laws put in place by the Geneva convention. Besides that, we use torture to get information. Now don't get me wrong, we don't go and cut of limbs and stuff like that, we use mental torture. Embarass a few radical Islamists and get some good information. When our nations security is at risk, you would rather these terrorist be treated fairly? That being said, I think torture is validated.You have just done exactly what I said earlier. You are using the fact that terrorists don't abide by the Geneva convention in order to validate and rationalize the fact that we didn't. If it is wrong it is WRONG. PERIOD. Just because the other guy did it first doesn't make it OK.