mattc_099 Wrote:Well the last line of Nightworld (original version, of course) describes him as a "young red-haired man with an ageless thirty-five year old body" so to me it's pretty clear that he is still immortal.
Maybe Paul means he's a guy who looks young even as he ages? We've all seen men and women like that.
mattc_099 Wrote:Well the last line of Nightworld (original version, of course) describes him as a "young red-haired man with an ageless thirty-five year old body" so to me it's pretty clear that he is still immortal.
That was my take as well. I figured that the Ally wasn't going to make the same mistake twice, and poor Glaeken is stuck with immortality again.
-Luthie
luthie2 Wrote:That was my take as well. I figured that the Ally wasn't going to make the same mistake twice, and poor Glaeken is stuck with immortality again.
-Luthie
Hmmmm...maybe it could go both ways.
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:Hmmmm...maybe it could go both ways.
Maybe, but I choose to also believe that Glaeken is stuck with the immortality. Otherwise it would go to Jack and then he'd have to watch both Gia and Vicky and everyone else he cares about get old, maybe horribly ill, and die while he stays young. At least Glaeken is used to it! :p
.
It's Thirteen O'Clock
-------------------------------------
"I said, Hey Senorita - that's astute, I said, why don't we get together and call ourselves an institute?" --Paul Simon
-------------------------------------
"In the final analysis, the last line of defense in support of freedom and the Constitution consists of the people themselves." -- Ron Paul
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
webby Wrote:Maybe, but I choose to also believe that Glaeken is stuck with the immortality. Otherwise it would go to Jack and then he'd have to watch both Gia and Vicky and everyone else he cares about get old, maybe horribly ill, and die while he stays young. At least Glaeken is used to it! :pSPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
DON'T LOOK--YOU'LL SPOIL YOUR ENJOYMENT OF LIFE
But isn't it established in HARBINGERS that Jack in =not= the Heir?
Major HARBINGERS spoilers!!
*
*
*
*
*
*
Not Kidding!
*
*
*
*
I got just the opposite. The only reason for the Ally to be pruning away Jack's "branches" is because he's the heir. :confused:
*
*
*
*
*
*
Not Kidding!
*
*
*
*
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:SPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
DON'T LOOK--YOU'LL SPOIL YOUR ENJOYMENT OF LIFE
But isn't it established in HARBINGERS that Jack in =not= the Heir?
I got just the opposite. The only reason for the Ally to be pruning away Jack's "branches" is because he's the heir. :confused:
.
It's Thirteen O'Clock
-------------------------------------
"I said, Hey Senorita - that's astute, I said, why don't we get together and call ourselves an institute?" --Paul Simon
-------------------------------------
"In the final analysis, the last line of defense in support of freedom and the Constitution consists of the people themselves." -- Ron Paul
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
webby Wrote:Major HARBINGERS spoilers!!
*
*
*
*
*
*
Not Kidding!
*
*
*
*
I got just the opposite. The only reason for the Ally to be pruning away Jack's "branches" is because he's the heir. :confused:
Maybe we're using "heir" differently. But please clue me in, Webby--
SPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
YOU STOP THIS FIGHT I'LL KILL YOU
I am slow, ugly, unskilled, can't dance, knows nothin', but I've never understood why an "heir" is needed when Glaeken's still around.
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:Maybe we're using "heir" differently. But please clue me in, Webby--
SPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
YOU STOP THIS FIGHT I'LL KILL YOU
I am slow, ugly, unskilled, can't dance, knows nothin', but I've never understood why an "heir" is needed when Glaeken's still around.
Isn't the whole point of an heir that they exist while the current holder of a title is around - i.e heir to the throne is only an heir because the current king is still in place!
Once Glaeken dies Jack will no longer be the heir - he will be the Ally's representative on earth
The artist formally known as Britfan
Major HARBINGERS spoilers!!
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Glaeken isn't indestructable. He could be killed if he were injured seriously enough. I've been figuring that making Jack the Heir is the Ally's way of having a "backup" just in case Glaeken were to be killed somehow.
Maybe there have been Heirs waiting in the wings as long as Glaeken has been alive - just in case. The Heirs don't get immortality as long as Glaeken stays alive.
PS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:Maybe we're using "heir" differently. But please clue me in, Webby--
SPOILER
SPOILER
SPOILER
YOU STOP THIS FIGHT I'LL KILL YOU
I am slow, ugly, unskilled, can't dance, knows nothin', but I've never understood why an "heir" is needed when Glaeken's still around.
Glaeken isn't indestructable. He could be killed if he were injured seriously enough. I've been figuring that making Jack the Heir is the Ally's way of having a "backup" just in case Glaeken were to be killed somehow.
Maybe there have been Heirs waiting in the wings as long as Glaeken has been alive - just in case. The Heirs don't get immortality as long as Glaeken stays alive.
PS
Bluesman Mike Lindner Wrote:YOU STOP THIS FIGHT I'LL KILL YOUhuh???
This post was last modified: 10-30-2006, 05:03 PM by webby.
.
It's Thirteen O'Clock
-------------------------------------
"I said, Hey Senorita - that's astute, I said, why don't we get together and call ourselves an institute?" --Paul Simon
-------------------------------------
"In the final analysis, the last line of defense in support of freedom and the Constitution consists of the people themselves." -- Ron Paul
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Britfan Wrote:Isn't the whole point of an heir that they exist while the current holder of a title is around - i.e heir to the throne is only an heir because the current king is still in place!
Once Glaeken dies Jack will no longer be the heir - he will be the Ally's representative on earth
Right. Gotcha. Had a little brain-lock there. It happens a lot.
