I will correct a previous statement that in fact if I created a game based on RJ, it could be considered infringement based on the CR laws, but under the "Fair Use" act, the legalities of it even though it would be freeware could be a tough call.
Just to give you some background info...on a previous post, I had sent an email to FPW/webmistresses asking about doing an "Official RJ Myspace", but as of right now, I am posting an "Unofficial RJ Myspace" which is still under construction.
But that is neither here nor there...
The question is about the thread created here...
Was it an issue of me "Implying" that "I" was going to create this game?
Or, was it an issue of you "Assuming" my intentions?
I am not here to start issues or do the whole drama of bickering back in forth, cause for the past 15 years, I have gone to work everyday, fought for, and at times given up my own liberties and freedom of speech that "Libertarians" talk so much about. I respect everyone's views on how they feel, but in my line of work, there are no gray areas or room to imply.
Implying at most is a liberal characteristic, that allows others to view it for how they think it should be. It is actually in the same grouping as assuming. For me, it has to be conservative and concrete...black or white...no gray area.
Like OJ...He can write a book about "What If" and we can all assume that he did it based on his ideas...(which I believe he did), but at the end of the day, he never said he did it...
No hard feelings man, just wanted to clarify things on my behalf...