Sorry bones, I meant that as an action star, he has the ability to play the hero, villian, thug, FBI agent, and so forth. I for one could not see him in a comedy, due to his action star stereotype.
When I select a movie to watch, I already have an idea if it is a big production style, or a B quality of movie. I like both. Transformers was an awesome movie, that was designed to create realism to the Sci-Fi fantasy of the Transformer storyline. Something that is very hard to do when it comes to taking a cartoon or comic and making it into a movie.
I did not like Dare Devil. Ghost Rider was okay, but did not meet my expectations. Iron Man was great. The new format for Batman has been phenomenal. The Hulk was great with Ed Norton, but I am not sure how well the CGI's will fit with the Iron Man movie format. Did not like the Fantastic Four movies(never been a big F4 fan). Spiderman was good and word on the new "Venom" is that it will be a darker movie, kinda like the latest Batman movie. Sorry got off on a tangent...lol
The Bond movies had gone overboard with the past format and that is due to impart of lack of creativity (my opinion). They made the past couple of Bond movies into the typical sequels that people go to see because of the franchise. I did enjoy Casino Royale, but without all the gadgets that the Bond character was always built around, it puts him in the same category of another Max Payne, Jason Bourne type hero. The gadgets should be more realistic and along with the current technology. Like an ipod that is an actual magnetic detonation device, that will have a countdown on the screen. Stuff like that. Bond is just another secret agent without the gadgets.
Sorry if I come off very analytical at times, but I am a big movie buff. When I am not watching a movie I am reading. I do not like the boob tube that much, only a few shows really interest me anymore. I hope this clearifies a little more of my thought process.