Pages (2): 1 2   
fpw   06-22-2006, 08:29 AM
#1
[SIZE="3"]Not a great review for the anthology, but she sure likes Jack.[/SIZE]

Books of The Times | 'Thriller'
Pie Topped With Spleen, and Other Hard-Boiled Tales
E-MailPrint Save

By JANET MASLIN
Published: June 22, 2006
International Thriller Writers Inc., an organization founded in 2004, has over 400 members whose combined sales figures add up to more than 1.6 billion books. Now this group has issued an anthology — with its title in raised letters and blood on its cover, of course — to illustrate what thriller writers do.

Skip to next paragraph

Sue Solie Patterson
James Patterson

THRILLER
Stories to Keep You Up All Night
Edited by James Patterson

568 pages. Mira. $24.95.

Readers’ Opinions
Forum: Book News and Reviews
On the evidence of "Thriller," one thing they do is dust the cobwebs off fragments and outtakes and package them as short stories. Another is direct those stories toward grisly, unmotivated violence, the ghastlier the better. A third is cook up tough-guy names for characters ("Major Frost Jorgenson") or for strings of books ("Recoil," "Recon," "Return"). Many also lay claim to attributes as interesting as those of their characters. "Thriller" illustrates that too.

One contributor, Raelynn Hillhouse, is a former Fulbright fellow who lives on the slopes of the Mauna Loa volcano. She "has not only faced the barrels of Kalashnikovs" but has also "run Cuban rum between East and West Berlin, smuggled jewels from the Soviet Union and forged Eastern bloc visas." Ms. Hillhouse's story, "Diplomatic Constraints," is comparably daring. It features a shotgun-packing Stella in the midst of real turmoil: a fierce attack on the American Embassy in Pakistan in 1979, two weeks after a similar, better-publicized event in Iran.

Although "Thriller" has been edited by James Patterson and blurbed by some of the genre's luminaries, its emphasis is not on well-known practitioners. Prolific as he is, Mr. Patterson hasn't supplied a story.

One of the few high-profile contributors is Lee Child, the best thriller writer of the moment, whose contribution comes from an early draft of an early novel and offers a brief but revealing glimpse of the author's character Jack Reacher. Mr. Child is also a contributor to the dueling anthology "Death Do Us Part," the Mystery Writers of America's book edited by Harlan Coben and due later this summer.

So thriller writing and mystery writing overlap. But how? The best answer "Thriller" offers is that if mysteries depend on deductive processes, thrillers care more about "bloated intestines strung across the ground like festive streamers," as James Rollins so enthusiastically puts it. Each of this book's stories is a build-up to deadly mayhem, which is often committed at the expense of reason. These tales would rather kill off the wrong man than not kill anybody at all.

For instance, one of the better entries here is Gregg Hurwitz's "Dirty Weather," which is set in a truck-stop restaurant in the dead of a Michigan winter and develops its characters well, at least for a few pages. The place is near a prison and is popular with guards; when a new guy shows up, he catches the eye of the proprietor's daughter. Then, trouble: "The door smashed open and a man with a gun charged them, screaming so loud flecks of saliva dotted the bar." Although this uproar ought to be sufficient, the story gratuitously leaves somebody to die in the snow.

Law enforcement figures are a major presence here. For instance, there is Alex Kava's Special Agent Maggie O'Dell, who thinks of apple pie as gory because she once saw "a perfect piece of apple pie with the victim's bloody spleen neatly arranged on top." Instead of treating this as a revelation about Maggie, Ms. Kava puts it on her story's second page and makes it a way of saying hello.

The book's more effective writers are at least able to do this with economy. (From J. A. Konrath: "Bang bang and he was a paycheck for the coroner.") But there is plenty of overwriting here too. (From Heather Graham: "The wind railed with the sharpness of a banshee's shriek.") And some of it wouldn't get past a high school English teacher. (From M. Diane Vogt: "The night-light illuminated him enough that the camera would record perfectly.")

"Thriller" slows down for a couple of incongruous period pieces, like "The Double Dealer" by David Liss, with its 18th-century setting and emphasis on flatulence, or "The Tuesday Club," by Katherine Neville, featuring Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin and other well-known Americans in Paris. ("One might be lonely in Paris, thought Abigail Adams with chagrin — but one could surely never be alone!")

The only dated stories of real interest are those that trace the thriller's evolution. "Success of a Mission," by Dennis Lynds, offers a glimpse of Arab-American relations circa 1968 and expertly deploys old-school espionage tricks like microfilm hidden in a piece of halvah.

The best of this book's contributors illustrate why quick thinking is more interesting than a thumb in the eye ("going all the way through the cornea, the meniscus, and into the brain," in the words of David Dun).

The most welcome discovery, for readers new to the thriller universe, is F. Paul Wilson's Repairman Jack. The character is enjoyably well drawn, and he's no James Bond: "Interlude at Duane's" centers on a robbery at a Duane Reade drugstore in New York and calls on Jack to outsmart the thieves with whatever he can find amid the merchandise. It's the rare story here that has a beginning, middle and ending, as well as some neat tricks in between.
Though many of its authors write books that move quickly, "Thriller" itself is surprisingly slow going. That's because each story's contrivances take getting used to. And the more far-fetched they are, the harder that is.

One moment the hook is drug-smuggling in Albania; at another it's the blackmailing of a plastic surgeon in Beverly Hills. Even the switch from Christopher Rice (secret homosexuality) to Christopher Reich (fine dining) is more difficult than it sounds.

FPW
FAQ
"It means 'Ask the next question.' Ask the next question, and the one that follows that, and the one that follows that. It's the symbol of everything humanity has ever created." Theodore Sturgeon.
webby   06-22-2006, 11:14 AM
#2
fpw Wrote:[SIZE="3"]Not a great review for the anthology, but she sure likes Jack.[/SIZE]

The most welcome discovery, for readers new to the thriller universe, is F. Paul Wilson's Repairman Jack. The character is enjoyably well drawn, and he's no James Bond: "Interlude at Duane's" centers on a robbery at a Duane Reade drugstore in New York and calls on Jack to outsmart the thieves with whatever he can find amid the merchandise. It's the rare story here that has a beginning, middle and ending, as well as some neat tricks in between.

This reviewer is obviously highly intelligent and has excellent taste. Big Grin I love that she used the word "neat" in reference to Jack's tricks!

I'd say this is confirmation of what we here already know - Repairman Jack is the best thriller character around and you, sir, are an exceptionally talented writer!

[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]

.
It's Thirteen O'Clock
-------------------------------------
"I said, Hey Senorita - that's astute, I said, why don't we get together and call ourselves an institute?" --Paul Simon
-------------------------------------
"In the final analysis, the last line of defense in support of freedom and the Constitution consists of the people themselves." -- Ron Paul

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Kenji   06-22-2006, 11:19 AM
#3
webby Wrote:I'd say this is confirmation of what we here already know - Repairman Jack is the best thriller character around and you, sir, are an exceptionally talented writer!

[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]


That's right. Everybody knows that. That's why we're here. Wink
Weatherford   06-22-2006, 03:07 PM
#4
Great review - couldn't agree more!! Smile
BrettM   06-22-2006, 03:47 PM
#5
Weatherford Wrote:Great review - couldn't agree more!! Smile
Ditto, though I'm only up to the middle of the blackmailed-plastic-surgeon story right now. So far it's been kind of tedious (except for RJ). I haven't run across anything to keep me up all night ... or stop me from putting the book down. Maybe my expectations were too high, but I had sort of hoped for a book full of RJ-quality stories. Looks like I'll be sticking to my usual SF habit, rather than switching to massive thriller consumption.

Brett

*SLMW 1.0* No animals were harmed in the production of this message.
Maggers   06-22-2006, 05:13 PM
#6
As with all before me here, I agree wholeheartedly.

Pardon my denseness, but who wrote that review? Maslin or some unknown reviewer?

Reading is freedom.
The mind soars, no earthly cares,
no limitations.
A Maggers Haiku, 2005


Years ago my mother used to say to me... "In this world, Elwood, you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant."
Well, for years I was smart.
I recommend pleasant.
You may quote me.

Elwood P. Dowd

cobalt   06-22-2006, 11:01 PM
#7
And another review that just says it all.........great writting from "The Man" again. And yes, that's why we're here. :p

EWMAN
BrettM   06-27-2006, 08:20 AM
#8
I've finished the book without finding anything to change my earlier assessment. Blech. (Except for RJ, of course.)

But, I do have one question. The intro to the book claims it's the first ever anthology of thriller stories. Huh? Looking over at my shelves, I see a bunch of Alfred Hitchcock Presents anthologies from the 60s: Stories not for the Nervous, Skeletons from my Closet, etc. Anthologies full of cracking good stories that sure seem to fit the definition of "thriller" to me, though they are weighted more heavily toward science fiction and horror than the ITW anthology.

Surely there must be other examples out there as well. Or am I misunderstanding the term "thriller"?

Brett

*SLMW 1.0* No animals were harmed in the production of this message.
SickThing   06-27-2006, 11:49 AM
#9
I have to disagree with the reviewer. While many of her specific comments are accurate, I thought the majority of the stories were pretty good. I liked some more than others, of course, and the RJ story and Gregg Hurwitz's were the two best, but given that many of the stories were setups or outtakes for other series characters, I thought they worked pretty well.

It sounds like the reviewer's main problem is that she doesn't like gore or violence and wasn't expecting them in this anthology.

Which brings up BrettM's question. The label "thriller" that's used today isn't the same as what "thrillers" used to be. Today's thrillers usually center on law enforcement personnel or spies or characters like RJ or Jack Reacher, and not the old-style horror thrillers. Hence the claim that it's the first thriller anthology.

Hunter
jaybird   06-28-2006, 10:03 AM
#10
webby Wrote:This reviewer is obviously highly intelligent and has excellent taste. Big Grin I love that she used the word "neat" in reference to Jack's tricks!

I'd say this is confirmation of what we here already know - Repairman Jack is the best thriller character around and you, sir, are an exceptionally talented writer!

[ATTACHMENT NOT FOUND]
Congrats Paul!!! You da man!!!

:p A good horror story will keep you up at night
Pages (2): 1 2   
  
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.
Made with by Curves UI.