jimbow8 Wrote:I guess you could view it that way, but I didn't take quite that harsh a view of the movie. I eat at fast food places quite a bit (bad habit and laziness) and am overweight, but I don't blame the fast food companies for that; I blame myself for that. However, fast food has evolved into such a HUGE business and HUGE corporate lobby that some of their business practices are very unhealthy for the general population. I didn't so much view it as an indictment of the fast food companies(though I think it is), as much as I viewed it as an eye-opener to people to show people just how unhealthy such food can be.
It's not the food that is unhealthy, it is some people's
choices that are unhealthy. I couldn't view Kaye's semi-annual Big Mac Attack as unhealthy in the slightest. But every dregging day?!? That's just stupid. And even then it wouldn't be so bad if these people would just get some exercise.
Quote:Yes, it is capitalism at its truest. However Capitalism has no regard for who it helps and who it hurts. The movie (and the extra feature interview with Eric Schlosser) points out that these menu items are not just thrown together; they are VERY carefully researched to find the exact perfect taste and this includes many additives which are "addictive." The movie points out that only THREE items on the McD's menu do not include sugar: Diet soda, french fries, and I forget the other one but it is not the salad - the salads have sugar.
More ignorance.
Firstly, Capitalism is a system wherein the means of production and distribution are privately owned . . . and operated for profit. Usually -- hopefully -- in a free market. What's wrong with
that?! What is wrong with trying to make a living by giving your customers what they want? And by trying to give your customers a better deal for their dollar than the other guy?
What's the alternative to Capitalism? Communism? Socialism? Fascism? Some combination?
You can't legislate people's choices any more than you can legislate insanity.
Secondly, although "fries" don't contain sugar, they
do contain carbohydrates. Carbohydrates contain starch, and starch in turn is changed into sugar by your digestive system. A lot of things are changed into sugars by your digestive system. You couldn't live without sugars. But how much you consume is nobody's business but your own.
Quote:I totally agree with you here. The movie is basically trying to give people information which is (debatably) not readily available from the fast food industry itself: just how unhealthy an alternative it is.
Sounds more like it's trying to lay the blame for "A's" choices on "B." Fast food is
not an unhealthy alternative . . . in moderation. Eating too much of anything is unhealthy. Just as not eating enough of anything is unhealthy.
Quote:One of my favorite parts was when it was pointed out that 20-30 years ago (and still today from some restaurants) when you got a hamburger the meat all came from the same cow. Nowadays, a single meat patty being used by McD's and the other big chains can literally come from over a thousand different cattle - all in the same patty!
Sounds like more than just a little bit of an exaggeration to me. Seems like somebody is making vast pronouncements after doing half-vast research.
Quote:Also, the raising of livestock is very unhealthy, both to the livestock and to the end product. Cattle are regularly penned in confined spaces and root in their own filth, which causes disease and use of antibiotics.
Obviously, someone hasn't paid very close attention to the beef industry. Beef cattle are mostly confined for the short period of transportation to -- and in -- feed lots shortly before they are slaughtered. During that time they are fed from troughs. Most of the time they are/were fed hay and corn in its natural form. However, today, feed lot cattle are fed hay and corn in pellet form . . . it's healthier for the cattle, and easier to feed them with.
Rooting "in their own filth" is not something cattle do anymore than you do. Living in it, yes, but rooting in it, not so much. And the reason they live in it -- mostly during confinement in feed lots -- is because it's so darned expensive to keep the lots clean . . . another problem caused by the minimum wage.
Antibiotics are there to prevent to prevent sickness from spreading due to those temporary crowded conditions. But mostly because cattle are very susceptible to becoming "car-sick" during transportation. This car-sickness -- which is dealt with by feeding them Teramycin Crumbles during transportation -- weakens them and makes them susceptible to catching other diseases.
All these problems, as people see them, are caused by the necessity of fast mass-processing of food for people who live en-mass in confined areas, i.e., cities. Eliminate the cities -- and their populations -- and you eliminate the problem. (Not advocating it . . . just pointing it out.)
Quote: Livestock remains are also used as feed for other animals. This is one of the main reasons for the spread of Mad Cow Disease and others related.
Yep, that's why so many cats and dogs and pigs get mad cow disease.
Quote:Again, I am not in favor of suing fast food for obesity, etc, but I do think they hold some responsibility and could easily try to become a more healthy alternative as opposed to worshipping the Almighty Dollar! In my opinion, the movie was designed to provide people with information that they haven't been offered before or probably aren't aware of.
Information? Or propaganda?
As FPW pointed out, a lot of people aren't interested in healthy alternatives.
And finally, what's wrong with worshipping the "Almighty Dollar"? You have something better to worship?
Ken V.