A quick question about the Adversary Cycle - Printable Version +- RepairmanJack.com Forums (https://repairmanjack.com/forum) +-- Forum: F. Paul Wilson Related (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: F. Paul Wilson Main Forum (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: A quick question about the Adversary Cycle (/thread-4598.html) |
A quick question about the Adversary Cycle - jerrund - 04-03-2012 Were either "The Keep" or "The Tomb" revised for the most recent (trade paper) version? Thanks A quick question about the Adversary Cycle - Marc - 04-03-2012 I believe only The Tomb is, but it was more just clean up revisions. Nothing substantial was added. A quick question about the Adversary Cycle - Damin J. Toell - 04-03-2012 THE KEEP also had some tidying up. I believe FPW posted that he came across some 30-year old errors that had evaded correction. Edited to add: on 11/8/10, FPW posted on the boards that the latest edition of THE KEEP just had "[m]aybe a few turns of phrase and shading in dialogue, but nothing of much consequence." See http://www.repairmanjack.com/forum/showthread.php?12292-THE-KEEP-(new-edition)&p=263304#post263304 Edited further to add: on 4/11/10, FPW sez: "No appreciable difference in The Keep for the average reader. I tweaked the prose a little, killing some passive voice, etc. Not much beyond that." See http://www.repairmanjack.com/forum/showthread.php?11316-Adversary-Cycle-tpb-schedule&p=248866#post248866 |