+- RepairmanJack.com Forums (https://repairmanjack.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Other Topics (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-9.html)
+--- Forum: Off Topic (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-4.html)
+--- Thread: Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* (/thread-3447.html)
Pages:
1
2
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Kenji - 06-19-2009
Today was the opening day, so I saw Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.
Just one word: "Swell". :thumbsup: See? As I said "No spoilers".
Okay, I want to say more. "T.F.:RotF" had high quality CGI and spectacle action scenes. They were amazing. A lot of robots were there, and their speedy moves surprised me. But storyline and characters were poor ( I don't like Shia LaBeouf as Sam. Moreover, I don't like Sam's parents. They irritated me! ).
Well, it's Michael Bay's destructive movie as usual. If you liked first film, and if 2 hours 30 min doesn't annoy you, you'll enjoy it more.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - johntfs - 06-19-2009
Did the movie at least pick a tone and stay with it? The previous movie had trouble with that. It was an uneasy fusion of a light-hearted story about a boy and his friendly robot car and a violent horrorfest about the human race being attacked by shape-shifting death machines.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Kenji - 06-19-2009
johntfs Wrote:Did the movie at least pick a tone and stay with it? The previous movie had trouble with that. It was an uneasy fusion of a light-hearted story about a boy and his friendly robot car and a violent horrorfest about the human race being attacked by shape-shifting death machines.
johntfs, this is Michael Bay's action movie. You can guess about that.
This time, there wasn't a light-hearted story.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Wapitikev - 06-29-2009
The only thing missing from the abbreviation of the title is an L
Transformers: RotFL
-Wapitikev
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Alvin Fox - 06-29-2009
That's because there is no laughing.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Wapitikev - 06-29-2009
AlvinFox Wrote:That's because there is no laughing.Well, unless I get to Roll On The Floor for 2.5 hours with Meagan Fox, then that doesn't seem like a very good deal...to me.
-Wapitikev
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Alvin Fox - 06-29-2009
I would watch Megan Fox Roll On The Floor for two and a half hours. With or without transformers.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - cobalt - 07-04-2009
Enough Megan Fox...sheesh.
We saw Transformers last night. No spoliers....but
I hate the parents. If they were mine...I'd run away from home.
Lots of material in this one that could have been cut and it wouldn't have hurt the story.
My one complaint....in the first movie...they slowed down the transforming from one form to the other...it was neat. In this movie...the action was too fast...almost overwhelming.
All in all though...I enjoyed the movie.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Brian - 07-05-2009
Well now, Megan Fox is easy on the eyes. :p
But agreed, too much with the parents and other things that just didn't need to be there.
The action was swift and jam packed into this one, you have to admit. If asked for a favorite, the original would be my choice.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen *No spoilers* - Alvin Fox - 07-05-2009
Wapitikev Wrote:The only thing missing from the abbreviation of the title is an L
Transformers: RotFL
-Wapitikev
We need to start thinking of what the third Transformers movie title will be. I think it's gonna use the abbreviation Transformers: LMAO.