![]() |
Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Printable Version +- RepairmanJack.com Forums (https://repairmanjack.com/forum) +-- Forum: Other Topics (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-9.html) +--- Forum: Off Topic (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) (/thread-2033.html) |
Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Susan - 11-21-2006 NewYorkjoe Wrote:Oh, no, don't tell me they followed the book? You may need to put a spoiler alert on your message, NYJ. Susan Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Susan - 11-21-2006 Maggers Wrote:Aww ...but it makes me and Lisa feel great! Hey girlfriend! I agree about Craig in Munich. He was wonderful. What I've enjoyed about his acting roles is that he seamlessly becomes the character and you totally forget that you're watching Daniel Craig. Not that I don't enjoy watching Daniel Craig, mind you! (see below) :p ![]() Yummy! Susan Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Susan - 11-21-2006 jacobm Wrote:Even my wife who refused to see a Bond movie for years said she loved this film. Daniel Craig has been excellent in every movie I have seen (ie: LayerCake, Munich) and he is every bit James Bond, certainly more so than anyone since Connery. The scene when Bond steps out of the ocean brought a gasp from my wife...I think she will see another Bond film after this. Not to rub it in, but.... ![]() ![]() Susan Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Scott Miller - 11-21-2006 Susan Wrote:Not to rub it in, but.... It's pretty cool that they attached his head to my body, eh? Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - cobalt - 11-21-2006 I thought we would see this newest Bond this weekend, well after all the raves and those luscious pics.......yup, we're going! Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Susan - 11-22-2006 Scott Miller Wrote:It's pretty cool that they attached his head to my body, eh? ROTFL! That was brilliant, Scott. What's your telephone number again? ![]() Susan Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - jimbow8 - 11-26-2006 ***Possible slight spoiler*** I saw this last night. I thought it was awesome. But then I "figured it out," and realized the Mr Bond HAD NOT figured it out. Then he "dove in" anyway. I also didn't like the introduction of a brand new character for the very last scene. Other than those ..... very good. The new Bond is a BLEEDER! :p Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - cobalt - 11-26-2006 Great flick. Powerful action and lots of neat gadgets. Plus!!......pics of Bond butt....... But I still like the original with David Niven as Bond. Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - BrettM - 11-27-2006 NewYorkjoe Wrote:The original Woody Allen "Casino Royale" was mere campGasp! NOTHING with Peter Sellers, David Niven, Orson Welles, Ursula Andress, etc., etc., etc. could ever be mere anything! Plus an uber-cool theme by Herb Alpert, may his lips never wrinkle. ![]() Casino Royale Review (no spoilers) - Dave - 11-27-2006 jimbow8 Wrote:***Possible slight spoiler****** Spoiler *** He was introduced in the first ten minutes of the film if you were watching carefully. I liked it. Craig did a great job, and the script was well done, however it did have an odd structure to it (which is not bad), but agree that the last scene felt a scene too far. The whole audience seemed to sigh in frustration, "another one?" And I concur with Jim, Bond bleeds, bleeding is good!!! Dave |