+- RepairmanJack.com Forums (https://repairmanjack.com/forum)
+-- Forum: F. Paul Wilson Related (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-8.html)
+--- Forum: F. Paul Wilson Main Forum (https://repairmanjack.com/forum/forum-3.html)
+--- Thread: Jack v. Mitch Rapp (/thread-2521.html)
Pages:
1
2
Jack v. Mitch Rapp - Lisa - 10-14-2007
Mitch Rapp is a pansy ass, unimaginative, poorly written shadow of Jack.
No offense.
Jack v. Mitch Rapp - Maggers - 10-14-2007
Lisa Wrote:Mitch Rapp is a pansy ass, unimaginative, poorly written shadow of Jack.
No offense.
Lisa, tell us what you really think. This time, don't hold back.
Jack v. Mitch Rapp - law dawg - 10-14-2007
Maggers Wrote:Lisa, tell us what you really think. This time, don't hold back.She has got to stop sugarcoating things.
It can be unhealthy.
Jack v. Mitch Rapp - Auskar - 10-14-2007
law dawg Wrote:Barry Eisler's John Rain (assassin fixer) and Lee Child's Jack Reacher (kind of fixer, in a way) also come to mind. In fact, there used to be a legendary thread on who would win between the two (Rain vs. Reacher) that even got the author's to wade in.....Read all those. Who would win between Jack Reacher and John Rain? John Rain is sneakier, so if it was something planned out beforehand, I would say Rain. If it was something that happened in the immediate world, the here and now, then I would say Jack Reacher.
I'm always right.
But Joe Pike would kick both their asses.
Jack v. Mitch Rapp - webby - 10-14-2007
Auskar Wrote:Read all those. Who would win between Jack Reacher and John Rain? John Rain is sneakier, so if it was something planned out beforehand, I would say Rain. If it was something that happened in the immediate world, the here and now, then I would say Jack Reacher.
I'm always right.
But Joe Pike would kick both their asses.
You have a point there.
But if Pike wasn't available, Windsor Horne Lockwood III could do it. Win scares everybody.